![]() ![]() Consider if I made a square and a circle out of very thin sheet metal. Genralz, in case you mean MOI of a cylinder or cubiod etc.īut I'm not just "making up a mass that has no meaning". Yes you can make up an mass that has no meaning, I don't care. The simple fact is that the MOI formula requires a mass to have some meaning. To a very large extent, it doesn't really matter at all that no 2-D object has mass, or that there is no such thing as a perfect circle, mathematically such objects do exists and we can perform mathematics on them.įrom what I read genralz isn't interested in math for the math. It is a simplifying assumption made primarily to make the math easier and get a result that is going to be very close to the real world. Just like mathematically we can and do use point masses and point charges all the time, despite there being no such thing in the real world. Mathematically we can assign an area density or mass per unit area and make it mathematically have mass. ![]() If you want to start down that road, why not just say that a circle or square can't have an MOI because there is no such thing as a perfect circle or perfect square? Kedas, while physically being merely a 2-D object a circle or square wouldn't have any mass in the real world, it doesn't prevent us from mathematically talking about a circle or square's MOI.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |